Rtx 2070 Vs Rx 5700 Xt
Price now 743$ Games supported 100% Price now 402$ Games supported 100% Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters. Value for money To become the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. General operation parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, just for precise cess you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Annotation that ability consumption of some graphics cards tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future calculator configuration or upgrading an existing ane. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (ability supply compatibility). Parameters of retentiveness installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared role of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. Every bit a rule, data in this department is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the carte du jour itself. Supported technological solutions. This information volition prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. APIs supported, including detail versions of those APIs. Not-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark functioning rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you detect some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak upwards in comments section, we commonly fix problems quickly. This is probably the well-nigh ubiquitous benchmark, office of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under diverse load, providing 4 split up benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, x, 11 and 12 (the final existence washed in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX ten criterion using 1280x1024 screen resolution. Information technology taxes the graphics bill of fare with two scenes, 1 depicting a daughter escaping some militarized base located within a sea cavern, the other displaying a infinite armada attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in Apr 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Criterion coverage: 17% 3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX xi benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one existence few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken transport, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite beingness done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded past Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 16% Deject Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 criterion that was used for dwelling house PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird infinite teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Criterion coverage: xiii% Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. Information technology features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery animal seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 13% Ice Tempest Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, role of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets operation. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two infinite fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: eight% This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing xi tests in diverse use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games. Benchmark coverage: 1% Allow's meet how expert the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the boilerplate frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: +32.nine% −32.9% −26.4% +26.4% +five.9% −v.nine% +0.7% −0.7% −44.4% +44.4% +7.5% −7.v% +13.2% −13.two% −9.2% +9.2% −4.9% +4.ix% −1.viii% +1.eight% −3.4% +3.4% −3.6% +3.6% −13.1% +13.one% +22.ix% −22.9% −24.seven% +24.vii% +6.4% −6.4% +viii.3% −8.3% −38.9% +38.9% +8.nine% −8.nine% +12.5% −12.5% −14.1% +14.one% −ii.1% +2.1% +3.5% −3.5% +14.7% −14.7% −1.v% +1.v% −6.7% +6.7% +9.7% −ix.7% −12.viii% +12.viii% +three.2% −3.2% −20% +twenty% +ii.9% −ii.nine% −24.1% +24.one% +ane% −1% −seven.8% +7.8% −34.v% +34.5% −5.7% +v.7% −4.7% +4.7% +10.1% −ten.ane% −ii.2% +ii.ii% +8.9% −viii.9% −ten% +x% +0% +0% +10.1% −10.ane% −one.9% +ane.9% −18% +18% −one.ane% +1.ane% +35% −35% +half dozen% −6% +2.5% −2.5% −28% +28% +2.ii% −2.2% +13.3% −thirteen.3% −vi% +6% +16.7% −16.vii% +vi.seven% −6.vii% +0% +0% +14.three% −14.3% +21.ii% −21.2% +2.9% −2.9% −6.5% +6.5% −nine.ane% +nine.1% +218% −218% +6.5% −6.5% −nine.8% +9.viii% −25.4% +25.four% +108% −108% Technical Urban center couldn't determine betwixt NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT The differences in performance seem too small. Should yous nonetheless have questions apropos choice between the reviewed GPUs, enquire them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Practise you remember we are correct or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" push near your favorite graphics card. The nearest GeForce RTX 2070's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6650 XT, which is faster past one% and higher by ii positions in our rating. Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2070: The nearest Radeon RX 5700 XT's NVIDIA equivalent is TITAN 5 CEO Edition, which is faster past i% and higher past 1 position in our rating. Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 5700 XT: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with operation more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Hither you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well equally rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 on a scale of one to 5: Charge per unit AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to v: Here you tin ask a question nearly this comparing, hold or disagree with our judgements, or study an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Full general info
Place in performance rating 56 46 Value for money 33.81 71.22 Architecture Turing (2018−2021) Navi / RDNA (2019−2020) GPU code name Turing TU106 Navi 10 Market segment Desktop Desktop Release date 27 August 2018 (3 years ago) 7 July 2019 (3 years agone) Launch price (MSRP) $499 $399 Cost at present $743 (one.5x MSRP) $402 (1x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 2304 no data Core clock speed 1410 MHz no data Boost clock speed 1620 MHz no information Number of transistors ten,800 1000000 10,300 1000000 Manufacturing process engineering science 12 nm 7 nm Thermal blueprint power (TDP) 175 Watt no data Texture fill rate 233.3 304.8 Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe four.0 x16 Length 229 mm 272 mm Width 2-slot 2-slot Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin no data Memory
Memory type GDDR6 no data Maximum RAM amount 8 GB no data Memory bus width 256 Flake no data Memory clock speed 14000 MHz no data Memory bandwidth 448.0 GB/south no information Shared retention - no data Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort HDMI + no data G-SYNC support + no data Technologies
VR Set + + Multi Monitor no data + API support
DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_1) no data Shader Model 6.5 6.5 OpenGL 4.6 no information OpenCL i.2 no data Vulkan i.2.131 no data CUDA 7.5 no data Benchmark performance
Overall score
Gaming functioning
Full HD 129 128 1440p 88 85 4K 61 54 Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 fifty−55 78 Total Hard disk drive
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 101 76 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 87 110 Battlefield five 126 119 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 147 146 Cyberpunk 2077 fifty−55 78 Far Cry 5 114 106 Far Cry New Dawn 103 91 Forza Horizon 4 142 155 Hitman iii 164 172 Horizon Goose egg Dawn 113 115 Crimson Expressionless Redemption ii 117 121 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 112 116 Watch Dogs: Legion 107 121 Full Hard disk
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 86 70 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 73 91 Battlefield five 117 110 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 130 120 Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 75 Far Weep five 110 101 Far Weep New Dawn 99 88 Forza Horizon four 135 154 Hitman 3 144 147 Horizon Zero Dawn 88 85 Metro Exodus 78 68 Reddish Expressionless Redemption 2 65 66 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 105 112 The Witcher three: Wild Hunt 158 144 Watch Dogs: Legion 94 106 Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 64 62 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65 78 Battlefield v 108 105 Cyberpunk 2077 fifty−55 67 Far Weep five 104 103 Far Cry New Dawn ninety 97 Forza Horizon 4 110 148 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87 92 Watch Dogs: Legion 64 67 1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Mod Warfare 87 79 Hitman 3 93 95 Horizon Nix Dawn 61 56 Metro Exodus fifty 55 Ruby Expressionless Redemption 2 42 42 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 76 69 1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassinator'southward Creed Odyssey 52 53 Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla 50 59 Battleground 5 88 89 Cyberpunk 2077 fifty−55 xl Far Cry 5 88 83 Far Cry New Dawn 82 80 Forza Horizon 4 93 119 Sentry Dogs: Legion 47 46 4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 51 45 Hitman three 50 53 Horizon Zip Dawn 35 xxx Metro Exodus 32 30 Cerise Expressionless Redemption ii 27 27 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40 35 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63 52 4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 36 35 Assassin'south Creed Valhalla 31 33 Battlefield 5 55 60 Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 17 Far Cry 5 49 46 Far Cry New Dawn 51 56 Forza Horizon four 63 79 Watch Dogs: Legion 27 13 Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating 54.13 56.85 Novelty 27 August 2018 seven July 2019 Cost $499 $399 Fleck lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Cast your vote
Competitors of GeForce RTX 2070 by AMD
Competitors of Radeon RX 5700 XT by NVIDIA
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-2070-vs-Radeon-RX-5700-XT
Posted by: snyderthand1938.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Rtx 2070 Vs Rx 5700 Xt"
Post a Comment