Amd Fx 8320 Vs Fx 8350

sudo apt-get answer · Dec 29, 2013 19 0 10,520 2

Is the only difference that the 8350 is overclocked or is there better heat spreading on information technology or something? Could the 8350 be clocked higher than the 8320? If there is whatsoever other difference I would like to know

Thanks

Jared Jensen

The 8350 volition give you improve performance and overclocking, then I would suggest you go with that if y'all tin. The 8320 is just the 8350 underclocked a bit and then it the operation isnt as proficient but the price is a lot better. The 8320 is really better value considering how much it costs compared to its operation. Information technology's up to y'all but they're really close in performance.

Calledwarrock · Jul 10, 2013 42 0 ten,540 2

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Higher clock speed 4GHz vs 3.5 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed

Higher turbo clock speed 4.2 GHz vs 4GHz More than v% college turbo clock speed

Meliorate PassMark (Single cadre) score 1,525 vs 1,402 Around 10% better PassMark (Single core) score

Better geekbench (64-scrap) score 12,105 vs ten,478 More than 15% improve geekbench (64-bit) score

Better PassMark score 9,134 vs viii,183 More than than 10% better PassMark score

Slightly better 3DMark11 physics score 6,880 vs half-dozen,200 More than than x% better 3DMark11 physics score

Better PassMark (Overclocked) score x,147 vs 9,317 Effectually x% better PassMark (Overclocked) score

Better cinebench r10 32Bit score 23,437 vs 20,870
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8320

Much lower typical power consumption 101.56W vs 159.66W More than than 35% lower typical power consumption

Much lower almanac domicile energy cost 30.11 $/year vs 56.1 $/year More than 45% lower annual habitation energy price

Better performance per dollar 5.48 pt/$ vs 4.85 pt/$ Effectually xv% better performance per dollar

Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 109.five $/year vs 159.62 $/year More than xxx% lower annual commercial free energy cost

Slightly better performance per watt 7.01 pt/W vs 5.32 pt/W More than 30% meliorate performance per watt

Jared Jensen · Dec 7, 2013 341 0 10,960 62

The 8350 will give you better performance and overclocking, and so I would advise you go with that if you tin can. The 8320 is just the 8350 underclocked a bit and so it the operation isnt every bit adept merely the toll is a lot meliorate. The 8320 is actually better value considering how much information technology costs compared to its performance. It's up to yous but they're actually shut in performance.

JOOK-D · Aug 28, 2013 three,910 0 15,960 505

They perform identically when overclocked. The FX 8320 is cheaper.

A simple multiplier crash-land on the 8320 volition bring yous to 8350 speeds, with lilliputian effort. The 8320 is the better purchase by far.

sudo apt-get answer · December 29, 2013 xix 0 10,520 2

What I can't understand though is how the 8350 is about xv times more than popular than the 8320.

vmN · Oct 27, 2013 one,667 0 12,160 131

marketing, it is that unproblematic.

sudo apt-get answer · Dec 29, 2013 19 0 ten,520 2

marketing, it is that simple.

Would call back people were smart plenty to await at the specs before they purchase it..

s5229

virtually people dont overclock or know how to. This said iv.0 ghz looks much better so iii.5.. and like they said marketing scheme taking a 8320 and over clocking it and calling information technology a 8350. I'thousand not sure but maybe the 8350 comes with a amend stock heatsink then the 8320?

Albert153

I am agape to over clock

Amd Fx 8320 Vs Fx 8350

0 Response to "Amd Fx 8320 Vs Fx 8350"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel